Richard Feyman's views in Cargo Cult Science strike a peculiar message about conformity in science. While it might be a good idea to stick with the norm when in doubt, some scientists take it too far when they discourage the practice of repeating experiments for newer, more accurate results. Even more disappointing is the fact that this method is accepted by authority figures, such as teachers and professors. Feyman rings up a good example with the Cornell student. It's a shame that potential scientific breakthroughs are being held back by the fact that certain scientists feel that redoing experiments are a waste of time.
The Young experiment acts as an excellent counter-example to cargo Cult science. Mr. Young discovered valuable information regarding experimenting on rats. His work should be appreciated by other scientists, yet it is greatly ignored because of the fact that there is already a standard procedure on experimenting with rats. If this mindset persists, future scientific experiments will remain limited in results and discoveries.
Freyman's message is clear and should be acknowledged by both established science organizations and the scientists themselves. Science should not be so deeply entwined with money and position.
No comments:
Post a Comment